The emergence of the Internet
can be viewed as a highly significant leap forward in the communication evolutionary
process.
All over the world
governments have praised the virtues of social media as a new means to engage
or re-engage with citizens. It’s proven to be a way to become more effective
and efficient, and a brilliant way of bringing the citizenry and the government
closer
But I still see the issues of
Internet censorship as a big problem; freedom of speech online continues to be
threatened in countries like China, who have censored the usage and in April
blocked all Internet access.
I’m also concerned about the comments
made in Nigeria, by Senate President David
Mark who apparently thinks (the Chinese way) controlling the Internet is quite
appealing.
Last
week, Mark, said there was a need to
check the use of social media as Nigerians were using them to demean their
leaders.
The
truth is, social media does not demean Nigerian leaders…the penchant for corrupt
practices by some in leadership positions has already achieved that.
Stakeholders in corruption
will see the Internet as an irritating
breeding ground for the disenchanted and if I were in there position I would be
well miffed at the prospects of the walls closing in…What they need to
understand is that, its not the same type of politics anymore. The status quo is no longer acceptable. Things
are no longer easily hidden.
But
I have to ask, since the Chinese way is now appealing, why don’t we also adopt
the way they deal with corrupt public officials too? …. I thought not!
Mark also said that “We need to change our attitude on how we
report things about our country and we should emulate the foreign reporters who
never report negative things about their countries.”
WHO
IS HE KIDDING? !!! What foreign reporters is he talking about? E.g. The British press has had a long history
of bringing wrongdoing into the light of public attention. Here are a few
examples
· 1890s Liberal Party MP Jabez
Balfour was exposed as running several vast fraudulent companies to conceal
colossal financial losses. Balfour fled to Argentina, but was eventually
arrested and imprisoned.
· 1920s Winston Churchill
secretly accepted £5,000—the equivalent of perhaps millions in today's
money—from Burmah Oil (now known as BP) to lobby the British government to
allow them to monopolise Persian oil resources. (1923
· 1963 the Profumo Affair
· 1990s we saw, Arms to Iraq…
The Cash for questions scandal and the Cash for honors scandal
And
more recently the Government expenses scandal
The
list goes on….
All
these were exposed by a vigilant and expressive foreign press,
But
of course, Senator David mark would have known this, if he didn’t shy away from
the Internet.
Senator Mark, Google is your friend. Embrace it!
The
social networking phenomena did not exist 13 years ago when PDP came to power.
The explosive growth of the phenomena will only grow faster. This,
I’m sorry, is a fight you will loose…. It’s best for you to embrace Social
networking? … the Internet on the whole.
My
advise is, if there was nothing to hide and the government is as transparent as
it claims the social media should be heralded as the new way for the mass to
get information round
Good
performance from the leadership is the answer to critics not censorship!
Good piece.
ReplyDelete